877-454-3672

Search Tours

Conservation – it’s a journey

One of the main reasons for our trip to the Northeast was to investigate sustainable wildlife opportunities for our guests …

DSC00990

Bob and Onion were the first elephants we laid our eyes on at the  Elephant Valley Project. Giant, slow moving and deliberate a group of us watched as they made their way from the jungle into the river for a bath. The entire group was silenced by their presence, even the know–it-all freelance writer anxious to share his views on everything.

Conservation in Asia is a complicated equation. In a perfect world — which is of course an imaginary place — the intrinsic value of animals and ecosystems would always be respected and preserved. Realistically, as Cambodia and neighboring countries look to grow their economies, environmental interests are not alone and are often not prioritized.

While we were visiting the area, it occurred to me that Elephants, in all their glory, embody this modern-day struggle between development and conservation. As majestic as they are — to be in their presence is certainly overwhelming — their value in Asia goes well beyond an intrinsic one.

Currently, the biggest threat against the endangered wild Asian elephant is habitat loss and population fragmentation — there isn’t enough jungle left for them to roam and what is left separates herds with man-made obstacles.

For captive elephants and their owners in Mondulkiri there is an obvious struggle between traditions, economic opportunities and the animal’s welfare.

Looking to find a sustainable and humane elephant experience for our guests, my colleagues and I visited the Elephant Valley Project, a non-government organisation looking to improve the health and welfare of captive elephants.

Regine making her way to Heaven, one of the Elephant Valley Projects elephant areas.
Regine, and behind her Narla, make their way to Heaven, one of the Elephant Valley Projects elephant areas.

After climbing down to the river, we watched silently as Onion submerge herself completely in the water, like a toddler down by the lake. Bob, less keen on dunking his head, was happy to blow water out of his trunk.

Recognizing that the well-being of the elephants in Mondulkiri depends on the well-being of the neighbouring communities, the Elephant Valley Project is taking a holistic approach to protection. Beyond providing a jungle sanctuary for the dozen or so elephants that are currently residents, the organization funds rangers to protect local parks, provides healthcare for the neighbouring village and offers training for mahouts looking to take better care of their elephants. Looking to alleviate poverty on a wider scale — the less desperate people are the better nature fares — the NGO is looking at extending their health coverage to include more villages.

While it remains to be seen how successful the Elephant Valley Project will be with their future outreach, there was something unique about the elephant experience they offer. They don’t allow riding, in fact interaction with the elephants is limited. What they do offer is an opportunity to see elephants in as natural an environment as could be created. The rescues create small herds, talk to each other and act like, well elephants. Having seen elephants throughout Asia, either chained up or walking in circles with a basket loaded with tourists, it was fascinating to see them in their element.

Elephant ownership is a tradition among the Bunong, the ethnic minority that inhabit the area around the sanctuary. Pachyderms have been caught and used throughout the region as work animals for generations. Once used for logging and construction, the aging animals are now being passed down to the next generation of owners whose knowledge of animal care and interest in the beasts is increasingly diluted; poverty-stricken children and grandchildren of original owners share the stake in what income the animal can produce.

While elephants are still being used for the odd logging job, there is increasing pressure on the animals to turn a profit, causing some families to look to the tourism industry as a money maker.

DSC00964

In Pulung village, we met a woman whose family was one of about twenty with shared ownership of a 55-year-old elephant. The elephant, once used in logging, was no longer needed in the forest and the families were struggling to care for the elephant on their meager income.

We were told the elephantsroam free until they are booked for a tour — one that includes walking the elephant to a local watering hole and giving it its daily bath. Upon having a tour booked, the elephant’s mahout would go into the jungle and collect the animal.  Unlike the Elephant Valley Project, the Bunong do let guests ride the elephants for portions of the trek. Initially we were told that guests could only ride bareback, but later we saw evidence that baskets are still used. (Despite the size of the animal, it is not good for an elephant to carry heavy weight on its spine.)

While there was little doubt among my colleagues and I that the conditions weren’t ideal for the elephants, it was equally important for us to note that things weren’t much better for the community. Part of an ethnic minority, the Bunong have been relocated and forced to adapt to modern life. Living in small villages on the outskirts of Sen Monorom, they see little benefits from local tourism and even less investment in infrastructure from the government.

The community also seem to come to term with the fact that this would be the last generation to own elephants as the Bunong don’t breed their captive elephants. Baby elephants bred without the proper, very expensive, ceremony are believed to be bad luck and most of the captive elephants in the north are of an advanced age.

The pace and scale of development in Cambodia’s Northeast is having drastic effects of conservation efforts, not just for elephants. In Mondulkiri rubber plantations, road construction, mineral mining and logging are among the many interests vying for a piece of the same environmental pie. For the elephant’s sake, and ours, I sure hope there is enough to go around or that people learn to take less.

Read more »

Could ecologically conscious tourism help turn the tides?

Andreas

In 2012, Journeys Within partnered with Ray of Hope for a “Culture and Conservation Tour” meant to educate first hand about the separate and shared passions of each organization. Led by regional expert, Andrea Ross (right) and marine biologist, Andrea Marshall (left), guests spent one week exploring the highlights of Myanmar and the one week diving among the manta rays and learning about their plight. Ross and Marshall’s venture raises the question, can tourism help save some of the world’s most vulnerable species?

International efforts to conserve some of the world’s largest and most fascinating underwater species got a major boost at a wildlife conference in Bangkok, Monday.

Five different species of sharks along with two species of rays received additional protection from the global community after stricter cross-border trade restrictions were adopted at the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES).

Photographing Giants in Myanamr
A giant manta ray swims along the Myanmar coast. Manta numbers have been on the decline as a result of unsustainable fishing practices.

Similar proposals to protect marine megafauna have failed to garner enough votes around the CITES table in the past. New support from South American and West African nations – along with a promise of cash from the EU – are the driving force to this week’s tipping point.

Some are hailing this move as a shift in paradigms; countries are now beginning to recognize that the economic value of saving these species can be greater than selling off dead individuals.

Marine Megafauna Foundation, an education, research and conservation body founded by one of the world’s foremost researchers of mantas, Dr Andrea Marshall,  estimates that an individual manta ray can inject $1 million annually in tourism industry; ten times the amount that the dead animal’s much sought after gill rakers provide. Individual sharks are estimated to inject $800,000 into coastline tourism communities versus the few hundred dollars that the sharks bring in dead.

Visitors flocking to catch a glimpse at endangered animals undoubtedly brings about new problems — tourism dollars can be fickle and susceptible to trends, while animals tend to suffer under large crowds and human influences. These pressure can be predicted and mitigated in a way that protects the species.

While some may lament that these animals and the other endangered species still being discussed at CITES should be recognized for their intrinsic value — sharks are after all basically living fossils — viewing the animals as having more value alive than dead is a good start.

In some ways, developing sustainable, healthy and profitable tourism may be the only chance many of these endangered animals have.

Manta rays have faced drastic drops in populations as fishermen target the species for their gill rakers — a body part used in Chinese medicines.

“Manta rays are not a species that can afford to be exploited. [These new regulations are] desperately needed as a precautionary approach to avoid the over-exploitation of these species,” explains Marshall. “Those of us studying wild populations of manta rays are seeing first-hand substantial declines in their numbers across the globe. This is a real and pressing issue.”

A recently released paper in Marine Policy journal puts the number of sharks killed at an average of 100 million per year — or between 6 and 7 per cent of the overall populations. This practice is widely regarded as an unsustainable, leaving certain species at risk for extinction with unknown consequences to the overall ecosystem.

Should the initial decision not get overturned — the decisions could be reopened for debate at the final plenary session of the summit — governments will have to start abiding by the new restriction within 18 months. Obviously there is a long way to go from policy to action, but for many who have spent their lives working to save these magnificent beasts, this could be the moment where the tides begin to turn in their favour.

What exactly do the new protections mean?

The listing on CITES Appendix II —  the classification for the protections granted this week — means that any countries exporting those animals listed would need to prove that the catches came from sustainable and legal stocks.

According to CITES, “International trade in specimens of Appendix-II species may be authorized by the granting of an export permit or re-export certificate.  Permits or certificates should only be granted if the relevant authorities are satisfied that certain conditions are met, above all that trade will not be detrimental to the survival of the species in the wild.”

While wealthier countries like Australia and the U.S. can afford separate oceanic monitoring and enforcement to protect endangered populations, developing countries tend to rely on customs and regular law-enforcement. The new listing is meant to give those bodies additional powers to limit what is exported thereby helping curb the trade of endangered species.

 Who is CITES?

Founded 40 years ago, the convention aims to afford varying degrees of protection to the world’s plant and animal species that are subject to international trade.

Its aim is to ensure that international trade in specimens of wild animals and plants does not threaten their survival.”CITES website

According to the CITES website, there are 177 member countries from all over the globe.

Want more details on what the CITES conference is all about? Here is Prince William giving the low-down.Read more »